On 2013/06/11 06:40:13, lemzwerg wrote:
Yes, the union, since the documentation of \pad-to box says `at least
the X-EXT,
Y-EXT space'. However, the documentation strings for all \pad-XXX
functions
should be updated accordingly.
But \pad-around #-1 does work to reduce the extent of markup, and there is no reason to disallow that.
In particular, I can't see any difference between \pad-around and \pad-markup. Uh, oh, looking closely at the
source code
I see that they are completely identical, even after your patch! This
should
probably be fixed too, both in the docs and in the code...
There is no harm in having both. There might be people who habitually use each, and we cannot convert-ly their brains to use whichever one we pick. https://codereview.appspot.com/9295044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
