On 7 June 2013 11:07, Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:

> Am 07.06.2013 09:07, schrieb Keith OHara:
>
>> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 23:04:29 -0700, <m...@hohlart.de> wrote:
>>
>>  I think I'll draw a patch that corrects the minor faults; ideally,
>>> running
>>> fixscm again should lead in no changes at all.
>>>
>>>
>> That makes good sense.
>>
>> It is hard to spot unwanted changes among the good changes from running
>> the script.
>>
>>
>> time-signature-settings.scm, maybe some newlines
>>
>> @@ -312,24 +312,24 @@ a fresh copy of the list-head is made."
>>            (den (car revargs))
>>            (nums (reverse (cdr revargs))))
>>       (make-override-markup '(baseline-skip . 0)
>> -      (make-number-markup
>> -        (make-left-column-markup (list
>> -          (make-center-column-markup (list
>> -            (make-line-markup (insert-markups nums "+"))
>> -            den))))))))
>> +                          (make-number-markup
>> +                           (make-left-column-markup (list
>> +
>> (make-center-column-markup (list
>> +
>> (make-line-markup (insert-markups nums "+"))
>> +
>> den))))))))
>>
>
> done.
>
>>
>> define-markup-commands.scm, maybe some ;;
>>
>> 3037 (define-public (horizontal-slash-interval num forward
>> number-interval mag)
>> 3038   (if forward
>> 3039       (cond ;((= num 6) (interval-widen number-interval (* mag 0.5)))
>> 3040                                         ;((= num 5) (interval-widen
>> number-interval (* mag 0.5)))
>> ...
>>
>>  done. Thanks!
>
> BTW, I raised a new issue for this:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/**lilypond/issues/detail?id=3404<http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3404>
>
> and uploaded a patch:
>
> http://codereview.appspot.com/**9964049<http://codereview.appspot.com/9964049>
>
> Regards,
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
>>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> lilypond-devel mailing list
> lilypond-devel@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/**listinfo/lilypond-devel<https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel>
>

For some reason it wasn't being picked up by Patchy, so I had to
'turn-it-off-and-turn-it-on-again' so that Patch-New was detected for
testing.

In case you wondered.

james
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to