Hi Keith, sorry for not responding earlier. Many thanks for this comparison - i think it is very useful! Doing such comparisons is very important for LilyPond in my opinion. Maybe you'd like to turn this into a short blog post? I think that it would fit well with the focus of lilypondblog.wordpress.com.
And i agree that the output of the current dev version is looking good. best, Janek 2013/5/29 Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net>: > A different score is at <http://k-ohara.oco.net/Lilypond/> chosen to show > off the improvements made since version 2.16 (even the skyline-spacing of > text that I tried to throw out) and with source that complies both with > version 2.16 and current (which took some effort). > > There are workarounds in the source, but only for known bugs in both > versions. > > Maybe we want to give naturals on sixths just a bit of separation, but there > is an easy plan for that noted at the end of tracker issue 2141 > > There are some accidentals getting too close to rests (which can be resolved > with pitched rests). I noted on the tracker that issue 472 has come back in > some cases. > > > _______________________________________________ > lilypond-devel mailing list > lilypond-devel@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
