Maybe say "double angle brackets" for '<< ... >>' blocks, as simply "angle brackets" implies '< ... >'
https://codereview.appspot.com/8581044/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely File Documentation/usage/running.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/8581044/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode1056 Documentation/usage/running.itely:1056: @code{@{ @dots{} @}}, or angle brackets, @code{<< @dots{} >>}, like ",or double angle brackets" https://codereview.appspot.com/8581044/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode1071 Documentation/usage/running.itely:1071: curly or angle brackets. "curly or double angle brackets" https://codereview.appspot.com/8581044/diff/1/Documentation/usage/running.itely#newcode1086 Documentation/usage/running.itely:1086: but more likely you should be using angle brackets so the new staves "but more likely you should be using double angle brackets so the new staves" https://codereview.appspot.com/8581044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
