On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:30 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
> Regarding the description: "Acknowledgers should usually just register a
> grob (or write grob data) with any actual reading of grob data occurring
> at the end of the timestep instead."
>
> Strictly speaking, this principle has been violated already by allowing
> subproperty tweaks, as tweaking a subproperty requires reading the main
> property first.
>
> Moving the Tweak_engraver to Score level actually makes it more likely
> that other acknowledgers potentially writing a main property will have
> acted before a subproperty tweak is attempted.
>
> In this respect, this patch should decrease the likelihood of surprises
> (though not ruling them out altogether).

That's good! :)

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to