Hi Shane, > one would think that might cause more difficult > programming necessitating the keeping tracking of various R values > through out the piece as defined by a time signature as opposed to us > setting the value, which probably would also slow down lilypond having > to parse and hang on to that extra undeclared information.
Possibly — that's exactly why I posted the question. > But I do believe making sure the user is > forced to think out the value of R duration is probably more useful > than any minimal convenience, especially as Joram points out that > would make r and R functionality divergent. r and R functionality is already divergent (e.g., placement) — so that's hardly an additional concern at this point. Best, Kieren. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
