So many pitches are wrong in this patch that I think we should revert it and have it redone carefully.
Possibly using some automatism (like Frescobaldi's absolute/relative conversions, making sure that one gets the starting pitch right). As it stands, this just changes too much. https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely File Documentation/notation/ancient.itely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode224 Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:224: \[ g c a f d' \] This looks wrong. Shouldn't it be \[ g c, a' f d'' etc? It would appear that you replaced \transpose c c' with \relative c'' without bothering to convert _anything_ except the first note from absolute to relative notation. https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode378 Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:378: \new MensuralVoice = "discantus" \relative c' { Why not \relative c'' if the starting pitch is c''? https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode952 Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:952: @c @end example Where is the point in leaving random outcommented code in the document and letting it get more and more outdated? https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode1645 Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:1645: \[ b \] The original had b', but this would appear to be b instead. https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode1657 Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:1657: \relative c' { Again, this is now b rather than b' as previously. https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/diff/5001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode1688 Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:1688: \[ \auctum \ascendens b \] This is b instead of b' now. https://codereview.appspot.com/7538043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel