On 16 mars 2013, at 04:26, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > good enough > > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7516048/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm > File scm/define-grobs.scm (right): > > https://codereview.appspot.com/7516048/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode312 > scm/define-grobs.scm:312: (vertical-skylines . > ,grob::simple-vertical-skylines-from-y-extent) > I'm confused, because the fall-back for vertical-skylines seems to do > exactly the same thing for Spanners, and it looks like this is a > Spanner. >
That's only in the pure equivalent. The unpure function doesn't have this. > https://codereview.appspot.com/7516048/diff/1/scm/define-grobs.scm#newcode2237 > scm/define-grobs.scm:2237: (horizontal-skylines . > ,grob::simple-horizontal-skylines-from-x-extent) > The fall-back would be the same if this Grob were marked cross-staff = > #t Would it be more smarter to mark this and similar grobs cross-staff > ? Running regtests. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
