Hope I interpreted Trevor's comment correctly. The roposed "new" order did not occur to me since it violates causation: the (now) first change is dependent on the second one. However, that is on an implementation level and probably not interesting to the user.
https://codereview.appspot.com/7404046/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely File Documentation/changes.tely (right): https://codereview.appspot.com/7404046/diff/1/Documentation/changes.tely#newcode83 Documentation/changes.tely:83: would have been the other way round. This and the previous change On 2013/02/24 13:01:28, Trevor Daniels wrote:
previous? Perhaps invert the order of these two items.
Done. https://codereview.appspot.com/7404046/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
