On 16 févr. 2013, at 21:20, k-ohara5...@oco.net wrote: > Best, of course, would be to find and repair the code that cannot handle > zero-widths. We do not yet have the choice between "a bit better" and > "best", merely "a bit better" or nothing. >
One solution is to just allow 0-width buildings and then propose a bug fix whenever numerical inaccuracies actually creep in. In this case, we'd change the comment to something like "be attentive to 0-width buildings, as they may cause numerical errors." What would help, of course, is if the comment told what these errors could look like. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
