On 8 févr. 2013, at 08:45, "Keith OHara" <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Feb 2013 20:56:06 -0800, Trevor Bača <trevorb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: >> >>> Trevor Bača <trevorbaca <at> gmail.com> writes: >>> >>> > Did VerticalAxisGroup's default-staff-staff-spacing property stop >>> > respecting the 'padding' attribute between 2.17.9 and 2.17.10? >>> > >>> > I ask because I use a custom time signature context in my scores. >>> >>> No, padding still works. The latest LilyPond misunderstood what you >>> want with the zero-dimension TimeSignature. > >> >> Good point. I set zero-extent time signatures so that the notes in the >> score will be positioned exactly where they are supposed to begin when >> proportional notation is turned on. (You can see this in the small PNGs >> sent along with the original post.) With nonzero-extent time signatures we >> wind up with notes being pushed slightly to the right of where they should >> begin in order to accommodate the X-extent of time signatures that come >> between notes. > >> Other than that there's no particular allure to the zero-extent time >> signatures: they're just the mechanism I was best able to use to achieve >> the precision of horizontal layout. Quite happy to solve the problem a >> different way if some newer mechanism is recommended. > > Probably you should adjust your solution, because Mike's next patch > completely removes lines of music that have only zero-size extents. It removes vertical axis groups with empty skylines. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
