Colin Hall <colinghall <at> gmail.com> writes: > You might have seen the bug report from Paul Morris entitled: > "NoteHead X-offset, conflict with ly:grob-relative-coordinate" > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-lilypond/2012-12/msg00013.html
> If one of the devs could have a quick look and give me a moniker for > it, I'll raise a tracker. I don't see a bug. This is about how LilyPond behaves when NoteHead.X-offset is changed. Its pre-defined value points to a function that arranges one-or-more notes in a chord, choosing which go on which sides when small intervals are present. When Paul first asks LilyPond how she would arrange the note(s) in a chord, she refers to X-offset function, and then Paul's overwrite of X-offset is never used. It seem LilyPond has no further need to look ad X-offset and never notices Paul's change. Thomas notices that if he leaves the X-offset of the /first/ note in a chord at its default, LilyPond applies the default behavior to *all* the notes in the chord. Given that the default behavior is a collective arrangement of the note-heads across the chord, that makes sense to me. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
