On 2012/11/24 06:22:43, dak wrote:
On 2012/11/23 23:51:13, Trevor Daniels wrote: >
https://codereview.appspot.com/6852052/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely
> File Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely (right): > >
https://codereview.appspot.com/6852052/diff/14001/Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely#newcode1918
> Documentation/notation/changing-defaults.itely:1918: (The syntax
used prior to
> Release 2.17.6 was > On 2012/11/23 22:05:47, Graham Percival wrote: > > I don't think we should be talking about deprecated syntax;
otherwise we
could > > end up with tons of side comments. The documentation is large
enough as it
> is. > > We should keep "used prior" material in Changes. > > I agree in general, but the point is both forms of the > syntax are still valid and so should be documented.
I'm with Graham on this. The extension manual may talk about the
equivalence of
symbol lists in Scheme and LilyPond, but the whole point of the
exercise was to
remove a complication.
OK, I don't feel too strongly about this, and I'm out-voted. Revised patch-set on its way. Trevor https://codereview.appspot.com/6852052/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
