2012/10/27 <d...@gnu.org>: > On 2012/10/27 20:34:35, benko.pal wrote: > >> I want staves with line-positions like (-2 0 2 4) work.
> Why would somebody specify (-2 0 2 4) with the expectation that the > results should be identical to (-3 -1 1 3)? Why would he not specify > (-3 -1 1 3) in the first place then? How is something "working" when > it nullifies what the user is trying to do? clefs: when specifying (-4 -2 0 2), you can use \clef alto or similar to get a c-clef on the third line. in other words: when I want to LilyPond-ize ancient music using four- or six-line staff, the expected representation is a standard staff reduced or expanded by a line. I may well imagine that for some drumming applications the best choice is a staff spaced by three, e.g. (-4 -1 2 5), because this way every pitch in the range used is unambiguously assigned to a staff line. symmetrizing such a staff of even lines won't work at all. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
