On 2012/10/15 14:46:50, Trevor Daniels wrote:
On 2012/10/15 14:21:08, dak wrote:
> But that does not mean that the default mode of setting a property > should be pushing.
Why not? What harm will it do?
A stack filled with garbage from pushes that happened without particular intent is not more useful than no stack at all. In neither case will you be able to reliably return to a desired point of saving state before. At any rate, I've had it and won't waste more time on this issue. http://codereview.appspot.com/6687044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
