"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > Surely this points to the pop operation in \override as being at > fault? If \override was simply push, rather than pop-push then the > code above would seem to work as intended.
Sure. The idea presumably was not to have stack buildup from things like \voiceOne c c \voiceTwo d d \voiceThree c c > The further implication of \override being pop-push would seem to be > that if you do something like (pseudo code): > > {\override Flag style = mensural c8 c c c \override Flag color = red c > c c c} > > Then you'd revert the mensural style when you change the color? That > would be wholly unexpected to me. No, each property has its own stack. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel