Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:11 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> [...] >> In general, not requiring lookahead makes things more versatile. >> [...] > > thanks - i think i more or less understand why we prefer not to > require lookahead. > However, i'm not sure whether you are asking us for any opinion (if > so, what is the question, and can we see "before/after" example?) or > just letting us know about lookahead - ? > Sorry for being so direct, but i'm very short on time recently :(
I am considering removing existing functionality that's not likely to have seen any use so far, but at least is nailed down in regtests (input/regression/optional-args-backup.ly). So I am looking for objections. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
