Dear developers,
Thank you for your work on lilypond.
What about considering ( as a post-event and ) as a standalone event ?
c( )d( )e is symmetric and very clear.
best regards,
Mathieu
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:27 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> I don't think that distributing ( and ) between standalone event and
> post-event respectively is a concept that will carry the day
> sufficiently to be given a chance at a comeback. It would make
> (c (d) e)
> visually confusing. While neither the current
> c( d)( e)
> nor the standalone event version
> (c )(d )e
> will win a price for prettiness, they both beat (c (d) e) in conveying
> meaning rather than looking pleasing.
>
> --
> David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
