Dear developers, Thank you for your work on lilypond.
What about considering ( as a post-event and ) as a standalone event ? c( )d( )e is symmetric and very clear. best regards, Mathieu On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 2:27 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > I don't think that distributing ( and ) between standalone event and > post-event respectively is a concept that will carry the day > sufficiently to be given a chance at a comeback. It would make > (c (d) e) > visually confusing. While neither the current > c( d)( e) > nor the standalone event version > (c )(d )e > will win a price for prettiness, they both beat (c (d) e) in conveying > meaning rather than looking pleasing. > > -- > David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel