Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:38 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want
>>>> xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings ("xxx" "yyy" "zzz"). The main
>>>> incentive is to be able to have music functions be able to accept both
>>>> Stem as well as Staff.TimeSignature as a function argument.
>>>
>>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> doesn't this a different polymorphic annoyances somewhere else, ie.
>>>
>>> \set "keySignature" = #(..)
>>> \set "Staff.keySignature" = #(..)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>
>> I don't think the second line was ever permitted.
>
> Right, but
>
> \set Staff.keySignature = #(..)
>
> is, and it will be affected by this change?
Why should it?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
