Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:38 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> if we write xxx in LilyPond, this is considered to be a string. I want >>>> xxx.yyy.zzz to be a list of strings ("xxx" "yyy" "zzz"). The main >>>> incentive is to be able to have music functions be able to accept both >>>> Stem as well as Staff.TimeSignature as a function argument. >>> >>>> What do you think? >>> >>> doesn't this a different polymorphic annoyances somewhere else, ie. >>> >>> \set "keySignature" = #(..) >>> \set "Staff.keySignature" = #(..) >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> >> I don't think the second line was ever permitted. > > Right, but > > \set Staff.keySignature = #(..) > > is, and it will be affected by this change?
Why should it? -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel