On 2012/09/08 05:28:02, Keith wrote:
now I measure it 2% /faster/ than master.
Of course that makes no sense. I got confused of which executable I had when switching between patches. This patch is still about 6% slower than master, buy maybe worth it. Also, 'accidental-single-double.ly' is broke for me as well with starting with patch set 2, so nothing mysterious there. (It works if I just bypass the test for "restore-first".) http://codereview.appspot.com/6489086/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
