On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:51 AM,  <d...@gnu.org> wrote:
> If it had been up to me, "my" Schemy-dashes and underscores would have
> gone where the sun don't shine.  But while trying to create some
> more-or-less consistent syntax according to more-or-less simple rules, I
> try not to break all too many existing use cases.

Do i understand correctly - you say it would be cleaner to have
everything in camelCase?  Like, AccidentalEngraver, BeamThickness etc?
 I like it!

Janek

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to