On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 12:02:59AM +0200, m...@mikesolomon.org wrote: > > On 6 août 2012, at 23:23, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > I'd suggest an alternate method: the cache needs to contain: > > 1. the bar numbers of page breaks for the last _full_ > > compilation of file X > > Then the "quick" recompile simply re-uses those exact bar numbers > > for the line-breaks. > > This would be rather straightforward to implement assuming that > any additional bars would just get tacked onto the last line or > a new line. In big scores I see this cutting compilation time > in half.
Sounds good to me! > We're actually not too > far from this, as there is a single function that takes line > breaking info and splits systems accordingly. We just need to > override it such that the user can pass it data. Or rather: - when called with the appropriate flag(s), write the line-breaks to a cache file - when called with the appropriate flag(s), read that cache file - override the function to use the cached data I don't think we want users to be manually specifying the line-breaks. (although I suppose that might be a good debugging step to see if it works, before going to all the trouble of writing&reading data from a file) - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
