On 2012/08/04 09:20:57, Trevor Daniels wrote:
On 2012/08/04 08:27:10, dak wrote:
> But again: the real issue to me seems that we are > hiding a long chapter inside of a subsubsec already.
I agree. But to fix that would require rewriting pretty well the whole of chapter 1 of the NR. I'm not going to do that. Let's just fix this simple issue and move on, please. It's not ideal, but it's the best course available to us.
I don't see that ignoring even the proposal to use a combination of structuring commands with explicit markup is "the best course available".
And please stop sneering.
I would have called it "reviewing". Since I don't assume that you ask me to stop reviewing altogether, it would help if you pointed out what parts of the review you consider "sneering". I don't have the communication skills required for telling the difference. http://codereview.appspot.com/6452072/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
