2012/7/26 Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de>: > Am 26.07.2012 10:31, schrieb Keith OHara: > >> On Thu, 26 Jul 2012 00:51:56 -0700, <benko....@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Marc, please don't throw the whole 2533 issue stuff out; look at the >>> latest version at >>> http://codereview.appspot.com/6431044 >>> in particular bar-line.cc and repeat-sign.ly. >>> >>> I really don't mind if your patch goes before mine (it would even be >>> better - why push a change to a file that is to be thrown out by the >>> next commit), but I do mind that (some of) those cases work right, and >>> unfortunately I'm far less fluent in Scheme than in C++. >>> >> >> I had suggested that Marc incorporate pending changes to the bar-line code >> if he is confident in them, >> but it does seem cleaner make one commit a simple re-implementation of C >> to Scheme, with the same functionality. >> >> He is not really throwing out the issue-2533 stuff, because that stuff is >> not in the code base at the moment. >> >> You will just have to cooperate with Marc or another Scheme programmer, if >> the re-implementation goes in first. If it really turns out to be harder >> for the group to modify the code in Scheme than it was in C, then the >> reason >> for Marc's patch would prove to be wrong and we can just go back to C. > > I had already implemented Páls work on repeat signs *before* his patch > was reverted, so reimplementing this in scheme should be straightforward. > > ... and wait until you see what will be possible with barlines when part 2 > of issue 1320 is out ;-) Stay tuned!
ok, thanks in advance to everyone! _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
