Pushed as f7085cf9b2ff111b7d30c8a59e367c771a7e3c52.  Patchy is now running.

--
Phil Holmes


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: David Nalesnik 
  To: Graham Percival 
  Cc: Phil Holmes ; David Kastrup ; lilypond-devel@gnu.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 5:37 PM
  Subject: Re: push patch for issue 2679





  On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 11:34 AM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> 
wrote:

    On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 05:26:01PM +0100, Phil Holmes wrote:
    > I'd be happy to push this, but would like a little advice.  If I
    > go to Rietveld and download the raw patch set, it comes without
    > proper email addresses and formatting.  This means to push stuff
    > from Rietveld, I have to git apply the diff, then manually
    > update the author (assuming I remember).  Is there a way of
    > getting a formatted patch?


    Don't apply things directly from Rietveld.  Due to the problems
    that you discovered, we can only use it as a reviewing tool, not a
    patch management tool.

    David Nalesnik should send you the file he gets from
    git format-patch, after he fixed all merge conflicts etc.


  Arggh...sorry for making a hash of this :(  Hopefully, this patch will be 
properly formatted...

  -David 
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to