Hi, Keith, somehow i had overlooked this part of your email:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 7:33 AM, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > For any changed test then, it is probably worth reading the header, to > see if a subtle change that looks harmless happens to be the point of > the test (and would presumably cause other trouble). I was thinking about it, too (see "regtests about very small differencies" thread on devel). My conclusion is that using bigger staff (or font) size should be a good solution: it makes the changes more visible and immediately focuses reader's attention. See commit e8fc7813b17822c138150807484197ef8d4e7c21. Oh, and there's one more thing about regtests that came to my mind: we should perhaps have some sort of "special" category for regtests requiring manual attention (example: issue 2656 concerns only Windows). Of course these tests would be ran seldom (only when a new dev release happens perhaps?). cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
