On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Benkő Pál <benko....@gmail.com> wrote: > hi Janek and all, > >> There's a much easier way: set staff-size to something really big. >> >> I suggest that we adopt this as an official policy: fixes for >> easy-to-overlook things should be documented by regtests using >> big/enormous font-size (e.g. between 30 and 100, depending on issue). > > note that setting staff-size and font size is not exactly the same. > depending on the issue one or other method may be clearly better > than the other or one.
you're right, these are two different things. I should've written "big/enormous staff-size". (that's not to tell that setting big font-size doesn't have its uses) thanks, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
