On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:13 PM, Marc Hohl <m...@hohlart.de> wrote: > Am 06.07.2012 18:06, schrieb Joe Neeman: > >> [...] >> >> >> The semi-trivial C++ function is _not_ useful for the scheme code. It is >> used in two parts of the C++ code. However, because it belonged to the same >> file as various other functions that were being ported, Marc was planning >> to port this semi-trivial function to scheme also, and then call the new >> scheme function from C++ code. >> >> In the amount of time we've spent discussing this, we could have >> rewritten the function in scheme, haskell, perl, and brainf*ck by now. I >> really think that the best thing is just to leave the function where it is >> and stop worrying. >> > Thinking a bit more about the problem, what about rewriting the whole > Pointer_group_interface::find_**grob in scheme? >
Why? It's never called from scheme code. Anyway, I've made my opinion known, so I'm going to bow out of this conversation now. Cheers, Joe
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
