On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:28:46PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:55:20PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:44:53PM +0100, Graham Percival wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 12:30:18PM +0100, Colin Hall wrote: > > > > > > > > I've just created fresh binaries with GUB. Previously [1] you suggested > > > > uploading these to create an unofficial release. > > > > > > > > Still of interest? > > > > > > As a general note, yes. Right at the moment with 2.16 hopefully > > > in three days, I think it would only create confusion to advertize > > > an unofficial release. > > > > Fine, that was the response I expected. > > release countdown is cancelled due to > http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2397 > so if you've got some server space, an unofficial release would be > great.
See: http://www.charltonhall.eclipse.co.uk/ That's the space I get with my ISP account so bandwidth (cost) might be an issue. Would be nice if someone could mirror it so somewhere more robust/cheaper. > If you renamed the > binaries before uploading them to your server -- something like > lilypond-2.15.39-colin-1.linux-x86.sh Done. Cheers, Colin. -- Colin Hall _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
