Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> writes: > On 14/05/12 07:37, Graham Percival wrote: >> No. LilyPond is a command-line "compiler". That's something that >> would happen in an alternate program. > > I'm not disputing that, or suggesting that you go into GUI/IDE > territory directly -- what I'm suggesting is that consideration be > given to what might help enable such an alternative program. E.g. can > LP be in a position to permit an IDE to perform efficient background > compilation, enabling it to update as you type, and to alert you to > errors in your input? > >> Consideration will be given to overall compile speed, but that's >> it. A really intelligent editor could only update sections of the >> score at once (via the clip or skipMeasures functionality), but >> again that's back to "alternate program" territory. > > Well, the problem of LP right now is that to tweak a single note > requires a complete rebuild of the score regardless of how minimally > it affects the final output.
<URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/source/Documentation/notation/skipping-corrected-music> -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
