LGTM
http://codereview.appspot.com/6102045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely File Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely (right): http://codereview.appspot.com/6102045/diff/1/Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely#newcode1589 Documentation/notation/fretted-strings.itely:1589: <e\rightHandFinger 2> oh god. At one point, we tried to eliminate all #-less numbers to avoid confusion like this. I know that you're proud of parser work which lets us write a bare 2 here, but I fear this would lead to user confusion and not be a net positive. Could we leave the #2 > there? http://codereview.appspot.com/6102045/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel