"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes:

> I'm sure branches would be more efficient and more git-like, but last
> time I tried multiple branches, I forgot what state each was in.  With
> patches I can open them in an editor and look at them.

git log -p some_branch_name

> And I am aware of gitk, but this system just works for me at present.

If it worked well, we would not have had this thread.

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to