"Phil Holmes" <m...@philholmes.net> writes: > I'm sure branches would be more efficient and more git-like, but last > time I tried multiple branches, I forgot what state each was in. With > patches I can open them in an editor and look at them.
git log -p some_branch_name > And I am aware of gitk, but this system just works for me at present. If it worked well, we would not have had this thread. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel