On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 08:18:26AM +1100, Peter Chubb wrote: >> Hi Graham, >> >> Graham> We don't really have a frog meister, so nobody is taking >> Graham> responsibility for pushing >> >> I have another patch waiting, that depends on the first. >> >> Is there supposed to be a procedure for casual contributers to follow? > > No. If that sounds scary, then you have the right reaction. > > Or rather -- yes, there *is* a procedure. You're supposed to show > up, then the frog meister should contact you with any details you > missed (such as using our git-cl). Then you're supposed to upload > a patch, and the frog meister should keep track of your patch and > take care of all the details. But since we don't have a frog > meister, this falls down. > > So yes, you've been doing everything right. We simply don't have > anybody who is willing to do ~30 minutes of admin work per week to > help casual contributors.
For the record, i was frog meister for some time and i have to say that depending on quantity and skill of new contributors, frog meister work can take significantly longer than 30 minutes a week (if you want to give your contributors more attention than "send me a patch for pushing"). I'm sorry that i cannot help here now; my LilyPond time is irregular now and that doesn't make me a good candidate for frog meister. For example, i have an important math test on university in a week, and no free time to prepare myself for it - i'll have to cease LilyPond activity for several days. no cheers :( Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
