On 2012/02/23 12:37:04, MikeSol wrote: http://codereview.appspot.com/5626052/diff/40001/lily/stencil-integral.cc
File lily/stencil-integral.cc (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/5626052/diff/40001/lily/stencil-integral.cc#newcode932
lily/stencil-integral.cc:932: MAKE_SCHEME_CALLBACK (Grob, simple_vertical_skylines_from_possibly_transparent_stencil, 1); On 2012/02/23 12:29:06, dak wrote: > Why do we need this? I think that a _transparent_ stencil is not
supposed to
> create a different skyline. That's the point of setting
transparency rather
> than just #f-ing the stencil.
The problem is TabStaff and TabVoice. In both contexts, many grobs
are set to
transparent as a default. These are grobs that are never supposed to
factor
into a vertical skyline. I'd be interested in seeing what happens if
these were
set to ##f instead of transparent, but that'd be a new project.
a) the behavior is expected and consistent b) http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2085 is fixed and verified Setting that stuff to "transparent" is merely an ugly workaround used for historical reasons. We should not create inconsistent and complex semantics to half-heartedly support it. http://codereview.appspot.com/5626052/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
