On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Janek Warchoł wrote: > W dniu 11 lutego 2012 13:33 użytkownik Graham Percival > <gra...@percival-music.ca> napisał: > > Time+effort required to write a proposal. Would you be happy > > delaying the 2.16 for, say, a month, while we spend effort writing > > that proposal (which may or may not be accepted) ? When all's > > said and done, I wouldn't be surprised if it worked out to that > > much effort. > > I'll gladly spend some time on preparing the proposal.
Ok, maybe spend an hour or two and see what you come up with. > We can set prerequisites like C++, git and music (notation) knowledge, > so that we won't have to mentor people about this (takes a lot of > time). Agreed about git. Not certain about music notation; there's a lot of good work that somebody can do even if they have difficulty finding FACE on a treble cleff. OTOH, it might be nice "advertising" for us -- it would make lilypond "stand out" in the list of project requirements. I'm very uncertain about listing C++. There's a ton of stuff that people can do with scheme only. If anything, we might want to list scheme... but then again, there's a lot of things that can be done without scheme. > > But that's the whole point of GSoC. > > In the FAQ Google explicitly says that people familiar with the > project can participate. ok, but the application definitely shouldn't say that previous experience with lilypond is required. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
