Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 08:16:53PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: >> gra...@percival-music.ca writes: >> >> > However, there is clearly no desire to >> > actually create that two-line patch, so I guess that removing support is >> > the thing to do. >> >> Again: I don't have a clue about the involved work. But if it isn't >> happening, there is no point in never releasing something for those >> platforms which we _do_ actively support. > > Agreed; if you fix the other comments in my review, I'll give it a > LGTM. I'm just giving one more chance to somebody to care about > this.
Sure thing. When this will be going on countdown, I was also going to copy it to the user list. I also plan on mentioning it in the next LilyPond Report (no idea about when I'll be working seriously on that, hopefully soon), whether before or after 2.16 has been released. But as long as no users are seriously worrying about OSX 10.4 (and the only one actually offering a bounty was not doing this out of personal need, but because of sympathy with possibly mythical legacy users), there does not seem much of a point to expend the work, even if it is just few hours, for caring. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
