> So check it out at least once it is in Patch-review orderly. That
> means that it is regtest-clean, but that does not mean that a
> feature change will make its main users happy.
OK. BTW, I've meant staging, not master. Sorry for the thinko.
> And I might point out that it was you who _repeatedly_ pressed for q
> getting fixed because of its importance to you, even if it meant a
> solution expensive in developer and possibly execution time.
Well, I mainly forced implementation of `q' because I think it's
incredibly useful for LilyPond in general, not only for me.
> When you now can't be even bothered looking at it, I will think
> thrice before tackling anything which you call important.
Hold your horses, David! You are doing a great job, and I follow your
development steps quite closely, but there is real life interfering
sometimes. Not everybody has the same working patterns as you have.
Werner
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
