n.putt...@gmail.com writes:
> Hi David,
>
> Should I wait for a new patch or can I test using the latest one here?
>
> I've tried it out briefly on a real music example, and have a problem
> with identifiers:
>
> foo = \mark \default
>
> \relative c' {
> \foo
> c1
> }
You have the newest. The problem is the definition of ly:event? (for
recognizing postevents). It is currently (in lily/music-scheme.cc)
defined as the equivalent of
(define (ly:event? m)
(and (ly:music? m)
(ly:is-music-of-type? m 'event)
(not (ly:is-music-of-type? m 'rhythmic-event))))
That seemed to be more or less right. Apparently you found a "less
right" case.
Suggestions?
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
