On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 02:10:24PM +0000, plros...@gmail.com wrote: > I totally share your sentiment, but we depend on an external entity > here, which we cannot control. Suppose we go from 2.15.x to 2.17.x and > put the documentation under "v2.17". For some time, Google won't have > the new location in its index, so the search would get nothing. It > would be better to keep "v2.15" in the search for a while and have a > redirection from "v2.15" to "v2.17".
Great point! Could you add a comment to this effect to the top of this file? there's no way that I'll remember otherwise. > Speaking of redirections, I would > prefer that Lilypond had just two versions of its documentation online - > latest "stable" and latest "development". "v2.12" and "v2.14" shoould > redirect to "stable", "v2.15" should redirect to "development". We want to keep all stable docs available for historical reasons, but I'm not opposed to directing people to /doc/stable/ /doc/development/ rather than vX.Y. If you feel like looking into this, the htaccess is in Documentation/web/server/ - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
