On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 12:10:14AM +0000, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote: > On 2011/12/30 20:57:02, Graham Percival wrote: > >I'm still concerned about this type of automatic pushing. The revised > CG > >material on branches > > http://codereview.appspot.com/5484043/ > >makes a bit deal about always checking gitk -- just for 5 seconds -- > before > >pushing, and I think that's a good step. Patchy will not question any > > I think I can achieve that automatically by looking at the commit log > between staging and working. If there are no merge commits in that log, > we are good to push IIUC.
Hmm. Could I interest you in adding some checks to Patchy? I'd rather have that complexity in Patchy rather than lily-git.tcl -- that way, it doesn't matter if anything weird happens on a command-line or within lily-git; we're still protected. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
