On Dec 28, 2011, at 6:47 PM, n.putt...@gmail.com wrote: > On 2011/12/28 17:41:03, mike_apollinemike.com wrote: > >> I added it precisely to un-silently prevent negative numbers. >> It's true that it has no analogue in Scheme, but I didn't think this > was a >> prerequisite for adding a predicate. In lily.scm, there are several > predicates >> that don't have Scheme analogues (cheap-list, I believe, has no Scheme >> counterpart). > > I don't think that's a fair comparison. cheap-list is recognizably a > predicate for lists. Anybody who wants to check for a positive integer > isn't going to use ly:vsize? unless they're familiar with C++. > > Cheers, > Neil
Ah, I see what you mean. Yes, you're right, it's a better idea to create a positive-integer? predicate. Patch forthcoming. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
