On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 05:28:44PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> writes: > > > Skimming through lily/GNUmakefile, this makes sense. There's a > > couple of explicit dependencies for parser.hh, but these don't > > mention lily-lexer-scheme.cc, which is the file that triggers the > > fail. > > But the out/lily-lexer-scheme.dep file mentions it in the last line: > ../flower/include/arithmetic-operator.hh include/pitch.hh out/parser.hh > > Does that mean that we generate the dependencies without actually using > them? That sounds rather stupid, but then I don't understand the build > system anyhow.
... yes? no? Bottom line: somebody added explicit dependencies to lily/GNUmakefile, for some reason. It could have been somebody not really understanding the build system, but at least it worked. I wouldn't be surprised if Julien sent in a patch in a few hours/days that removed the explicit dependencies for the parser in favor of a more general solution. :) > Sorry for the inconvenience, but that was really unforeseeable for me. No problem; I'm quite happy that Patchy is pulling his weight so soon. :) Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
