On Dec 21, 2011, at 6:11 PM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote: > Mike, have you done any work to examine the effect of the value of > n_boxes on a) computation time, and b) quality of engraving fit? If > there is no effect on computation time, then we might as well err on the > side of too many. If there is a significant effect on computation time, > we ought to be careful to set the number as small as possible. >
I ran this : \repeat unfold 100 { \override Slur #'skyline-quantizing = #FOO f'8^"rit" ( c'' f'' c''' f''') r r4 | c'''2( c'' | g'1) ~ \startTrillSpan g'\stopTrillSpan g'\f( g) } Where FOO ranged from 1 to 19. The time of compilation ranged from 20.23 to 20.64 seconds and I didn't really see any difference above 10 boxes. I'll reduce the default to 10. > Also, in keeping with the desire to use full-word variable names, > perhaps box_count would be better than n_boxes. Will do. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel