On Dec 21, 2011, at 6:11 PM, carl.d.soren...@gmail.com wrote:
> Mike, have you done any work to examine the effect of the value of
> n_boxes on a) computation time, and b) quality of engraving fit? If
> there is no effect on computation time, then we might as well err on the
> side of too many. If there is a significant effect on computation time,
> we ought to be careful to set the number as small as possible.
>
I ran this :
\repeat unfold 100 {
\override Slur #'skyline-quantizing = #FOO
f'8^"rit" ( c'' f'' c''' f''') r r4 |
c'''2( c'' |
g'1) ~ \startTrillSpan g'\stopTrillSpan g'\f( g)
}
Where FOO ranged from 1 to 19. The time of compilation ranged from 20.23 to
20.64 seconds and I didn't really see any difference above 10 boxes. I'll
reduce the default to 10.
> Also, in keeping with the desire to use full-word variable names,
> perhaps box_count would be better than n_boxes.
Will do.
Cheers,
MS
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
