-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: Markup module patch (Issue 2026) Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:54:29 +0000 From: Ian Hulin <i...@hulin.org.uk> To: han...@xs4all.nl CC: Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com>, nicolas.sce...@gmail.com
Hi Han-Wen, On 19/12/11 02:52, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: > On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Ian Hulin <i...@hulin.org.uk> wrote: > > >>> <snip...> > While I can appreciate your sentiment, can we cut the swearing? It was > written by Nicolas Sceaux who is much more fluent at writing Scheme > code than I have ever been. Have you tried contacting him? > To the list, and Nicolas in particular: please accept my unconditional apologies if I have caused offence. I was attempting humour, quoting Douglas Adams' /Hitch-hikers Guide to the Galaxy/, and obviously failed. :-(. >> You mean: >> 1. do some icky stuff in the lilypond-file procedure to create a new >> lilypond scope, then make sure it (use-modules (lily)) before letting >> ly:parse-file loose in it? > > This is already done by the parser. > Thanks for the confirmation, I found where it looked like this was happening in the code since posting, but wasn't 100% sure. >> 2. have compile-markup-expression do a double lookup in >> (current-module), and if needed then look in (lily)? > > yep. > Cheers, Ian
_______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
