On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Ian Hulin <i...@hulin.org.uk> wrote:
>> Why can't the validation procedure look in multiple places? >> > > Because this means serious fiddling with the maoing markup code. I > really hope you didn't write it because I agree with David, it's a fetid > pile of Dingo's kidneys to maintain, and I fear it'll take me a > lo-o-o-ong time and much cursing and swearing to change it. While I can appreciate your sentiment, can we cut the swearing? It was written by Nicolas Sceaux who is much more fluent at writing Scheme code than I have ever been. Have you tried contacting him? > You mean: > 1. do some icky stuff in the lilypond-file procedure to create a new > lilypond scope, then make sure it (use-modules (lily)) before letting > ly:parse-file loose in it? This is already done by the parser. > 2. have compile-markup-expression do a double lookup in > (current-module), and if needed then look in (lily)? yep. -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
