"m...@apollinemike.com" <m...@apollinemike.com> writes:
> example. I've attached two versions of:
>
> \relative c'''' {
> <ais bis cis dis>
> }
>
>
> one from current master and one from the most recent version of my
> patch set. If the version from current master is acceptable in
> traditional typesetting, then I'll revert. But all the (meager)
> evidence I find is to the contrary (also see attached), which is why
> I'm standing by the most recent patch set.
Actually, I consider _both_ versions awful. When note heads and
accidentals each form a separate 2D cluster, the topography of the
clusters needs to be strongly related, or you don't have a chance to
unravel the correspondences when sightreading.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
