On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Kieren MacMillan
<kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
>> I am sure other more experienced programmers will chime in but having
>> two 'similar' functions
>>
>> \hideNote
>> \hideNotes
>>
>> Is a good idea.
>
> I thought we had settled on \functionOn and \functionOff (e.g., \sustainOn 
> and \sustainOff).
> So we should have \hideNotesOn and \hideNotesOff, right? Then \hideNote could 
> stand for "\once \hideNotesOn".
> That seems clear to me.

Ah, that makes sense.  I could do the rename, but is there some process
for handling non-backwards-compatible changes in syntax?

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to