Hi, Graham! I am sorry to say that I will be unable to participate in bug squad duties for at least few months.
Thank you, thank you developers and everyone who makes lilypond better .) I am sorry that I am saying this in in such a stupid way, I am sorry that this happens so "suddenly" (I had a hope to do "everything undone so far", but now I am unable, really) -- please, be lenient. Thank you! On Sat 29 Oct 2011, 05:42 Graham Percival wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 04:51:33PM +0300, Dmytro O. Redchuk wrote: > > On Fri 28 Oct 2011, 14:44 Phil Holmes wrote: > > > I think we do need the version number where the fix is claimed - > > > otherwise we would test fixes that aren't yet available in GUB, and > > > find they don't work. > > Well.. I think _we_ do need, really.. BugSquad, I mean. Do developers need > > it? > > Should we require these labels be assigned? > > They were initially started by developers, and I think they're > still a good idea. I think you should add that label for anything > that's missing it -- as long as you keep the "issues to verify" > list at 0 entries after a GUB release, anything that's claimed as > fixed but doesn't have a fixed_x_y_z tag can be just set to the > next devel version number. > > If there's anything in the backlog that you can't figure out, then > ask about that issue and we'll get it cleared up. If you don't > have an answer in... oh, 3 days?... then ask again. If you still > don't have an answer in another 3 days, then ask again, but less > politely. etc. > > - Graham -- Dmytro O. Redchuk _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
