On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 07:02:48AM -0600, Colin Campbell wrote: > In the interests of 'get it done and make the paper work agree', > would you and Graham let me know which issues/patches are going > through slightly different channels?
To be honest, I have no clue. > I gather that most or all of this would be Rietveld only, so > it's essentially invisible to the policy weeny, but if I can > stay out of the way, I'd be glad to turn the blind eye. I think the essential bit is the same. - when it's time for a countdown, 1. pick a bunch of patches with Patch-review. 2. announce them - when the countdown is done, look at any patches with Patch-countdown, and then either: 3. if there are complaints, change it to patch-needs_work 4. otherwise, change it to patch-push If a patch jumps from patch-new to fixed, or from patch-review to fixed, or whatever, that shouldn't change anything as far as you're concerned. When making the countdown you only care about "patch-review" items; when finishing the countdown you only care about "patch-countdown" items. - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
