On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:42:47PM +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> I am currently trying to make music functions more powerful, in
> particular their argument predicates. Also I am trying to relieve the
> parser from responsibilities.
Looks basically good to me. GLISS was never planned to tackle
scheme stuff, and waiting for GLISS 2 would take 2 years or more
at our current rate of progress. I see no reason to postpone this
change for that long.
> Now I have a possibly slightly contentious change... I want to let { }
> mimic the new functionality of #{ #} instead of creating sequential
> music unconditionally. That means the following:
>
> previously equivalent to now equivalent to
> { \with ... } syntax error context-modification
> { c4 } \sequential { c4 } simple-music
What happens if somebody writes
{ \with foo c4 \with bar d4 }
?
Cheers,
- Graham
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
